The suffering of a non-human animal is just as morally significant as the suffering of a human being.
Animal rights, utilitarian ethics
The suffering of a non-human animal is just as morally significant as the suffering of a human being.
Animal rights, utilitarian ethics
Found in 1 providers: grok
Cross Reference
1 source
"The ethics of what we eat has profound implications for animals, the environment, and human health."
Strange & Unusual"If we truly care about suffering, we must take action to alleviate it, not just feel bad about it."
Strange & Unusual"We have a moral obligation to prevent suffering, wherever it occurs, as long as we can do so without comparable sacrifice."
Strange & Unusual"Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Very often it is not wrong at all."
Controversial"We have a responsibility to future generations to protect the planet and its inhabitants."
Strange & UnusualPremium quality, printed on demand. Ships worldwide.
Don't see what you're looking for? Email us for custom products