Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Very often it is not wrong at all.
Animal rights, utilitarian ethics
Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Very often it is not wrong at all.
Animal rights, utilitarian ethics
Interview with 'The New York Times Magazine'
2006
Found in 1 providers: deepseek
Cross Reference
1 source
"We have a responsibility to future generations to protect the planet and its inhabitants."
Strange & Unusual"The idea of 'human rights' should be extended to 'sentient rights'."
Strange & Unusual"Our ethical decisions should be guided by reason and a concern for the well-being of all sentient beings."
Strange & Unusual"We have a moral obligation to prevent suffering, wherever it occurs, as long as we can do so without comparable sacrifice."
Strange & Unusual"If we can save a child's life by donating a small amount of money, and we don't, how are we different from someone who lets a child drown in a shallow pond?"
Strange & UnusualPremium quality, printed on demand. Ships worldwide.
Don't see what you're looking for? Email us for custom products